Comparison

Overview

Company snapshot and where each provider is based.

FieldLINK MobilityMitto
What it isEuropean communications-platform-as-a-service (CPaaS) provider offering SMS, MMS, RCS, WhatsApp, Viber, Facebook Messenger, Telegram, voice, and email messaging through REST, SMPP, and SOAP APIs.Swiss omnichannel CPaaS provider offering SMS, RCS, WhatsApp, Viber, Telegram, Facebook Messenger and voice messaging APIs for business communications.
Founded20012013
Ownershippublicprivate
Employees500-1,000100-250
HQ cityOsloZug
HQ countryNorwaySwitzerland
What's the differenceMitto edges ahead on the overall messaging.dev Score (48 vs 36). LINK Mobility is public and headquartered in Oslo, Norway; Mitto is private and based in Zug, Switzerland.

Channels

Which messaging channels each provider can send and receive on.

FieldLINK MobilityMitto
SMSYesYes
MMSYesNo
RCSYesYes
WhatsAppYesYes
ViberYesYes
Facebook MessengerYesYes
TelegramYesYes
Apple Messages for BusinessNoNo
VoiceYesYes
EmailYesNo
What's the differenceThey share 7 channels. LINK Mobility additionally offers MMS, Email.

Developer Experience

How quickly a developer can sign up and send a first message.

FieldLINK MobilityMitto
Self-service onboardingNoYes
Free developer creditNoNo
Docs qualitymedmed
DocumentationOpen ↗Open ↗
SDKs
Sandbox / test envNoYes
API typesREST, SMPP, SOAPREST, SMPP
What's the differenceMitto offers Self-service onboarding, while LINK Mobility does not; Mitto offers Sandbox / test env, while LINK Mobility does not; on API types, LINK Mobility adds SOAP.

Data & Compliance

Data residency options and enterprise compliance certifications.

FieldLINK MobilityMitto
EU data residencyYesNo
US data residencyNoNo
Choose regionNoNo
GDPRYesYes
ISO 27001YesYes
SOC 2NoNo
HIPAANoNo
What's the differenceLINK Mobility offers EU data residency, while Mitto does not.

Data Retention

How long message content and metadata are stored, and whether that is configurable.

FieldLINK MobilityMitto
Retention policyNot publicly documented in detail. LINK Mobility processes personal data under GDPR as a data processor and states in its GDPR documentation that it operates an integrated ISO 27001 information-security management system (ISMS) with the goal of meeting the requirements of the ISAE 3000 report; message content and metadata retention periods are governed by customer contracts/data-processing agreements rather than a published fixed retention window.Per-message retention of content (textRetention) and of the recipient number (toRetention) can be set per API request to Undefined, Retain, or Discard; no global retention duration is publicly documented. Per the privacy policy, account/registration data is kept until deletion is requested and contact-form data until the conversation ends.
What's the differenceLINK Mobility: Not publicly documented in detail. LINK Mobility processes personal data under GDPR as a data processor and states in its GDPR documentation that it operates an integrated ISO 27001 information-security management system (ISMS) with the goal of meeting the requirements of the ISAE 3000 report; message content and metadata retention periods are governed by customer contracts/data-processing agreements rather than a published fixed retention window. Mitto: Per-message retention of content (textRetention) and of the recipient number (toRetention) can be set per API request to Undefined, Retain, or Discard; no global retention duration is publicly documented. Per the privacy policy, account/registration data is kept until deletion is requested and contact-form data until the conversation ends.

Pricing & Credits

Pricing model and the cost of a first message.

FieldLINK MobilityMitto
Pricing modelVolume-based, pay-as-you-go enterprise pricing negotiated through sales; per-message rates are not published on the main platform.Pay-as-you-go — pay only for what you use with no contracts, plus volume discounts and custom plans via sales.
SMS starting priceNot publishedNot published
Free developer creditNoNo
What's the differenceLINK Mobility and Mitto are closely matched on pricing & credits — no material differences in the tracked fields.

Reach & Reliability

Global coverage and delivery dependability.

FieldLINK MobilityMitto
Countries covered0230
Direct operator connectionsYesYes
Published uptime SLANo published SLANo published SLA
What's the differenceMitto leads on Countries covered (230 vs 0 for LINK Mobility).

Company & Trust

Independent reviews and company profile.

FieldLINK MobilityMitto
G2 rating0.04.0
G2 reviews02
Ownershippublicprivate
Employees500-1,000100-250
What's the differenceMitto leads on G2 rating (4 vs 0 for LINK Mobility); Mitto leads on G2 reviews (2 vs 0 for LINK Mobility).

Still deciding? Read the quickstart guides: