Comparison
Overview
Company snapshot and where each provider is based.
| Field | GMS | Mitto |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Enterprise CPaaS and A2P messaging provider offering SMS, WhatsApp, Viber, RCS and email through a single API, plus messaging-hub and SMS-firewall services for mobile network operators. | Swiss omnichannel CPaaS provider offering SMS, RCS, WhatsApp, Viber, Telegram, Facebook Messenger and voice messaging APIs for business communications. |
| Founded | 2006 | 2013 |
| Ownership | private | private |
| Employees | 500-1,000 | 100-250 |
| HQ city | Baar | Zug |
| HQ country | Switzerland | Switzerland |
What's the differenceMitto edges ahead on the overall messaging.dev Score (48 vs 36). GMS is private and headquartered in Baar, Switzerland; Mitto is private and based in Zug, Switzerland.
Channels
Which messaging channels each provider can send and receive on.
| Field | GMS | Mitto |
|---|---|---|
| SMS | Yes | Yes |
| MMS | No | No |
| RCS | Yes | Yes |
| Yes | Yes | |
| Viber | Yes | Yes |
| Facebook Messenger | No | Yes |
| Telegram | No | Yes |
| Apple Messages for Business | No | No |
| Voice | No | Yes |
| Yes | No |
What's the differenceThey share 4 channels. GMS additionally offers Email, while Mitto additionally offers Facebook Messenger, Telegram, Voice.
Developer Experience
How quickly a developer can sign up and send a first message.
| Field | GMS | Mitto |
|---|---|---|
| Self-service onboarding | No | Yes |
| Free developer credit | No | No |
| Docs quality | med | med |
| Documentation | Open ↗ | Open ↗ |
| SDKs | iOS (Swift), Android (Kotlin) | — |
| Sandbox / test env | No | Yes |
| API types | REST | REST, SMPP |
What's the differenceMitto offers Self-service onboarding, while GMS does not; on SDKs, GMS adds iOS (Swift), Android (Kotlin); Mitto offers Sandbox / test env, while GMS does not; on API types, Mitto adds SMPP.
Data & Compliance
Data residency options and enterprise compliance certifications.
| Field | GMS | Mitto |
|---|---|---|
| EU data residency | Yes | No |
| US data residency | No | No |
| Choose region | No | No |
| GDPR | Yes | Yes |
| ISO 27001 | Yes | Yes |
| SOC 2 | No | No |
| HIPAA | No | No |
What's the differenceGMS offers EU data residency, while Mitto does not.
Data Retention
How long message content and metadata are stored, and whether that is configurable.
| Field | GMS | Mitto |
|---|---|---|
| Retention policy | Not publicly documented in detail. GMS's privacy notice states personal data is processed under EU GDPR (Regulation (EU) 2016/679) and held at its Switzerland headquarters (recognized by the European Commission as providing an adequate level of data protection); no specific retention periods for message content or metadata are published. GMS also holds ISO/IEC 27701 (privacy information management) certification. | Per-message retention of content (textRetention) and of the recipient number (toRetention) can be set per API request to Undefined, Retain, or Discard; no global retention duration is publicly documented. Per the privacy policy, account/registration data is kept until deletion is requested and contact-form data until the conversation ends. |
What's the differenceGMS: Not publicly documented in detail. GMS's privacy notice states personal data is processed under EU GDPR (Regulation (EU) 2016/679) and held at its Switzerland headquarters (recognized by the European Commission as providing an adequate level of data protection); no specific retention periods for message content or metadata are published. GMS also holds ISO/IEC 27701 (privacy information management) certification. Mitto: Per-message retention of content (textRetention) and of the recipient number (toRetention) can be set per API request to Undefined, Retain, or Discard; no global retention duration is publicly documented. Per the privacy policy, account/registration data is kept until deletion is requested and contact-form data until the conversation ends.
Pricing & Credits
Pricing model and the cost of a first message.
| Field | GMS | Mitto |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Custom enterprise pricing negotiated with sales; no public self-service or per-message price list. | Pay-as-you-go — pay only for what you use with no contracts, plus volume discounts and custom plans via sales. |
| SMS starting price | Not published | Not published |
| Free developer credit | No | No |
What's the differenceGMS and Mitto are closely matched on pricing & credits — no material differences in the tracked fields.
Reach & Reliability
Global coverage and delivery dependability.
| Field | GMS | Mitto |
|---|---|---|
| Countries covered | 0 | 230 |
| Direct operator connections | Yes | Yes |
| Published uptime SLA | 99.99% network availability (claimed; no formal SLA published) | No published SLA |
What's the differenceMitto leads on Countries covered (230 vs 0 for GMS).
Company & Trust
Independent reviews and company profile.
| Field | GMS | Mitto |
|---|---|---|
| G2 rating | 0.0 | 4.0 |
| G2 reviews | 0 | 2 |
| Ownership | private | private |
| Employees | 500-1,000 | 100-250 |
What's the differenceMitto leads on G2 rating (4 vs 0 for GMS); Mitto leads on G2 reviews (2 vs 0 for GMS).
Still deciding? Read the quickstart guides: