Comparison

Overview

Company snapshot and where each provider is based.

FieldApifonSMS.to
What it isGreek business-messaging platform for SMS, Viber, WhatsApp, RCS, Messenger and email campaigns, with a web platform plus REST and SMPP APIs.Omnichannel business messaging platform and API from Cyprus-based Intergo Telecom for sending SMS, Viber, WhatsApp, RCS and Telegram messages worldwide.
Founded20142016
Ownershipprivateprivate
Employees51-20051-200
HQ cityThessalonikiPaphos
HQ countryGreece (EU)Cyprus (EU)
What's the differenceApifon edges ahead on the overall messaging.dev Score (52 vs 49). Apifon is private and headquartered in Thessaloniki, Greece (EU); SMS.to is private and based in Paphos, Cyprus (EU).

Channels

Which messaging channels each provider can send and receive on.

FieldApifonSMS.to
SMSYesYes
MMSNoNo
RCSYesYes
WhatsAppYesYes
ViberYesYes
Facebook MessengerYesNo
TelegramNoYes
Apple Messages for BusinessNoNo
VoiceNoNo
EmailYesNo
What's the differenceThey share 4 channels. Apifon additionally offers Facebook Messenger, Email, while SMS.to additionally offers Telegram.

Developer Experience

How quickly a developer can sign up and send a first message.

FieldApifonSMS.to
Self-service onboardingYesYes
Free developer creditFree trial bonus on verificationFree trial credits on sign-up
Docs qualityhighmed
DocumentationOpen ↗Open ↗
SDKsJava, PHP, C#, Python, Node.jsPHP
Sandbox / test envNoNo
API typesREST, SMPPREST, SMPP
What's the differenceOn SDKs, Apifon adds Java, C#, Python, Node.js.

Data & Compliance

Data residency options and enterprise compliance certifications.

FieldApifonSMS.to
EU data residencyYesYes
US data residencyNoYes
Choose regionNoYes
GDPRYesYes
ISO 27001YesYes
SOC 2NoNo
HIPAANoNo
What's the differenceSMS.to offers US data residency, while Apifon does not; SMS.to offers Choose region, while Apifon does not.

Data Retention

How long message content and metadata are stored, and whether that is configurable.

FieldApifonSMS.to
Retention policyMessage logs (telephone numbers, message body, sender ID, timestamps) are retained for a default period of 24 months; other personal data is kept for as long as a contractual relationship exists. All personal data is stated to be hosted on servers located within the European Union.Customer data is retained only while the account remains open; on an account deletion request all data is deleted within 30 days. Customers can choose to have data processed only within the EU, in which case it is not transferred outside the EU; per-message content retention periods are not publicly documented in detail.
What's the differenceApifon: Message logs (telephone numbers, message body, sender ID, timestamps) are retained for a default period of 24 months; other personal data is kept for as long as a contractual relationship exists. All personal data is stated to be hosted on servers located within the European Union. SMS.to: Customer data is retained only while the account remains open; on an account deletion request all data is deleted within 30 days. Customers can choose to have data processed only within the EU, in which case it is not transferred outside the EU; per-message content retention periods are not publicly documented in detail.

Pricing & Credits

Pricing model and the cost of a first message.

FieldApifonSMS.to
Pricing modelPrepaid pay-as-you-go: customers top up a euro balance by card, PayPal, or bank transfer and messages are charged against it; per-message rates are quoted per account, not published.Prepaid pay-as-you-go credit with no contracts or commitments; per-SMS rates vary by destination and volume discounts are negotiated with sales.
SMS starting priceNot publishedFrom $0.023 per SMS (advertised base rate; per-country rates via downloadable price list)
Free developer creditFree trial bonus on verificationFree trial credits on sign-up
What's the differenceApifon and SMS.to are closely matched on pricing & credits — no material differences in the tracked fields.

Reach & Reliability

Global coverage and delivery dependability.

FieldApifonSMS.to
Countries covered2000
Direct operator connectionsNoYes
Published uptime SLANo published SLANo published SLA (public status page at status.sms.to)
What's the differenceApifon leads on Countries covered (200 vs 0 for SMS.to); SMS.to offers Direct operator connections, while Apifon does not.

Company & Trust

Independent reviews and company profile.

FieldApifonSMS.to
G2 rating4.84.4
G2 reviews34
Ownershipprivateprivate
Employees51-20051-200
What's the differenceApifon leads on G2 rating (4.8 vs 4.4 for SMS.to); SMS.to leads on G2 reviews (4 vs 3 for Apifon).

Still deciding? Read the quickstart guides: